| Could it be that the reason that chronic illness 
prevention has not been much on the mind of the reasoning public is because, up 
until this point in history, people have not generally had access to reliable 
information about brain function, maintenance and perpetuation? People have pretty much yet to be told that when the 
bodies' mineral content is increased its ionic content increases, thus its
voltage, thus it's electric power, which has a great 
deal to do with its brain's functional level, so they don't know. 
Consequently, they become aware, through their lives, that they increasingly 
run the risk of suffering the debilitating effects of chronic neurological 
impairment as their bodies' functionality drops (get old).   Because of an awareness of the phenomenon of decreasing 
brain output via the aging process some people 
may intentionally neglect and abuse the maintenance of their other vital 
systems and organs to the 
point that those systems' and organs' malfunctions result in the total termination of all of 
their physical bodies' life functions prior to the demise of the function of 
their brains. These people may figure that at least at the point of death it will no longer matter to them that 
their brain does not work, because, in death, they figure, no more harm may come to them through their 
body. It's not a winning strategic consideration, but they might figure that they will have won the battle of wills that 
sometimes  
play out throughout their lives if they end those lives prior to the 
manifestation of any neurological 
malfunction. People's reasoning involving the sacrifice of their biological lives, so that they can retain their 
ability to think totally throughout their self inflicted abridged version of them may seem a bit inverted. However, upon 
examination of the evidence, in many cases it could be difficult to refute the 
allegation that people's hopes of 
the maintenance of lucidity until their body's death drives them to actions that 
induce the termination of the function of either one, or many of their bodies' organs, 
thus the termination of their lives. 
		Q) Could this logic be used to explain why some people:    
		
 A) smoke too much, or
 B) or drink too much, or
 C) neglect and abuse their physical bodies in general, or
 D) do not try to exercise, or
 E) too often take dangerous and unnecessary risks?
 A) One can assign a 50/50 probability to any 
		two valued possibility. In this case, one could think that the people 
		concerned either behave accordingly, or not, making two possibilities. 
		Thus, the probability that people that do these acts are doing them for 
		this reason could be thought of as being 50%.   So, what does this cause of death 
statistic look like? Significant? Possibly more than one might think. What else 
would explain intentional toxic substance consumption? Here's my
email, or the
bioelectric discussion post page. Please, 
inform me, or us, if you've the mind to.   Its possible that while people are still rational, they see the effects of Alzheimer's, 
or what other debilitating chronic neurological illnesses do to their victims and how those 
victims get treated by other members of society and the medical profession. Because of what they witness, they may come to the 
simple conclusion that what happens to those people is definitely NOT what they 
want to allow to happen to them. They might figure that by keeping their own bodies' subordinate vital organs healthy 
they may run the risk of getting ushered on to a psych ward at some point in 
their lives, there to be treated more like the mere pets of the still thinking people 
than the humans that they presently are. To think is to be human. When people loose that qualifying trait they run 
the risk of being treated as less than such.  Because they go through life witnessing what happens to people whose brains 
malfunction and compare that to how they see other people treated whose other organs 
malfunction, they may decide that what happens to people that wind up with physical 
difficulties is better than what happens to people that acquire mental issues. A person, to one extent or another, might 
elect to neglect 
or abuse their 
bodies' vital systems and organs other than their neurological system, specifically to avoid 
the possibility of acquiring 
any age related neurologically debilitating illness/es. That same logic could explain some of the reasoning behind 
the decision to indulge in recreational drug use in 
that when the uninitiated see what happens to people that develop neurological 
disorders without having the information that they need to enable them to more 
assuredly avoid a similar fate, they could figure that there is little reason to 
not enjoy all of the 
alleged pleasures that are available to them while they can yet enjoy them even though those activities may 
even be against 
the law. Finally, when one or more of a person's body's subordinate systems and/or organs 
seriously malfunctions, they usually go to, "The Doctor." The mechanics of doctors 
are that they relay the 
teachings of the programs that they have been indoctrinated in, that make a 
living for them out of the bad events that occur to human bodies, to the people 
that possess bodily 
malfunctions that come to them for help to improve their bodies' conditions.   A good part of what doctors wind up relating is focused on keeping 
from upsetting the ideas that people have about their own mental 
stability, so that they remain confident in what the doctors are saying and 
doing to them, so that whatever the doctors have been programmed to do to obtain 
funding, does 
indeed occur and what no small part of that programming entails are the 
factors involved with the pay that many many people derive.   A coin toss would be an accurate way to predict whether the doctor or patient 
was benefited more from the delivery of the medical service�the 50/50 split. Even though they are in the act of committing at least third degree 
suicide, and thus avoid being turned into human pets; when the doctors see 
organ sacrificers, the doctors know at least that what works for the doctors is to do what they 
were told 
to do by their medical school instructors.   The doctors courses were set up by individuals that had a more developed 
idea of what to do with sick people than they did when they signed up for those 
courses 
and what that was, was how to live, themselves, while trying to keep others 
alive that wanted to stay alive, not to merely help everybody get healthier and forget about their own selves' 
conditions.   Because the people that wanted to help others thought that helping others was 
so important, they wound up spending maybe too much time at it and wound up with 
no other ways of supporting themselves than to charge for their services. Paying for medical services started in Greece with chickens, an extremely 
medicinal food by the way, but at this time costs much much more than one 
chicken when and only if the healing is successful, as the payment schedule 
began in Greece. The schools that developed the subject took care of making sure that the members of the medical 
profession were compensated so that they would in turn be compensated by formulating the curriculum to include how to 
derive compensation for healing and the development of that process has led to the situation that we have to 
day; seemingly excessive costs for seemingly inadequate healings. If it were to be pointed out that now there is a way 
that is available to people to help them keep their 
brains working well for the duration of their lives that they could learn to do 
themselves without too much ado, many of them might try to find out how. After all that is what they were attempting to do by acting out their 
personally abusive behavior, which did help them make matters they way they 
wanted them for some period of 
time, at least in their own eyes, but also came with the price tag of curtailing 
their lives lengths. The application of effective neurological function improvement technology, where 
possible, with maintenance might serve to slow down the flow of traffic into the hospitals, because the number 
of people getting sick would decrease. That would decrease the demand for 
medical products over all, thus help to curb health care costs.   The dispersal and use of the knowledge of how to attain neurological 
system and  brain function improvement and maintenance would raise the 
effective action level of people, which would be good, because when people are 
more effectively active they accomplish more, and more actions accomplished means more products, which means 
a greater supply of 
goods and services, which lowers prices, and all of that makes people more willing to spend the money 
that they have 
and an increase in people's willingness to spend money is what the economists 
refer to as, "Stimulating the economy," which is good for business. Ergo, the widespread use of information that helps people improve and 
maintain their neurological systems', including their brains', functions would not only prove 
to be a boost to the health of people, in general, but be a boon to the economy 
as well. Possibly, the geological region with the most people that find out about brain 
maintenance through the effective assimilation of mineral supplements will 
dominate world politics, because that region will be the one where people wind 
up with 
the fewest personal problems such as the one described in this essay, so the 
people of that geological region might remain freer to help other people with their problems 
and become their champions and heroes. Thus, they could possibly help upgrade 
the rest of the planet's peoples' mindsets (no-longer valid beliefs that are 
perpetuated due to the loss of will to view the present circumstances as they 
truly exist) to the more applicable ideation to those contemporary 
circumstances. The fact that people don't believe that doctors have the answers, 
because the doctors, themselves, profess this shortcoming, especially where 
neurological activity is concerned, could be viewed as being evidenced by people's willingness to 
accept, as readily as they do, the alleged facts that doctors relate to them regarding their 
bodies' mortality. However, the facts that: A) People many times have accumulated money 
that they can no longer control at the point that they usually stop animating 
their physical bodies well and B) 
members of the medical profession are many times stationed in  
positions of trust around those people just prior to and at that point, just may 
work together 
to make 
the medical profession look to be a very lucrative one to prospective employees 
that were more financially than medicinally goal oriented. As the bodily functions of an individual decrease, the amount 
of effort and resources needed to help keep them alive rises.   The decision may be made around a conference table, as 
opposed to an operating table, but there exists a point at which it may be 
deemed 
necessary to adjudicate whether it is yet economically feasible to 
augmentatively support an ill person's life. At this point, orders to keep that individual alive, by the efforts of 
paid individuals, may be terminated. Then, no-longer assisted, that individual 
either gets better, or 
they don't. Many times life now comes to a close this way. Should yours or your 
friends' end this way? With the 
		
ATM MHO/SHEEN BET I have 
been able to improve and maintain the 
continued function of my brain at an improved level. I mean that I like they way 
that it works for me now, not that it's going to go out and crush any and all of 
the other brains on the chess board or anything like that, but being able to 
think better does help me get along with others better, I have found. 
	 If a person holds their 
ability to think as their most valuable ability, it seems to me that if they use 
the 
		
ATM MHO/SHEEN BET they 
would no longer have to sacrifice 
the functions of other portions of their anatomy, in order to maintain this 
trait's superiority all of the way through their life, by resorting to means 
that would shorten that life's time. The 
		
ATM MHO/SHEEN BET is 
a format that individuals can use to customize their own therapeutic program, to not only stabilize the chemistry of their neurological system and 
thus brain, but to also improve 
the function of their bodies' other systems and organs as well.  
	 You may be able to call to mind someone who is now using, or 
someone from your 
past that has employed, an 
organically sacrificial strategy, in order to retain their lucidity 
until the termination of their human life. At this time, you, yourself, may possibly be entertaining at least passively sacrificial thought patterns, in 
order to avoid the possibility of living out some of your years as a neurological invalid. To be able to retain lucidity until the very end of life, wouldn't it be 
better to increase your brain's durability than to decrease your body's other 
organs' ability to function? To help yourself in the long run, maybe you could start 
making your own ATM MHO/SHEEN BET 
right now. All you should do is study about it 
all, procure the required substances and live on.  If and when you make your 
		
ATM MHO/SHEEN BET work for you, you 
may find that you like getting healthy again and you may be a bit happier, because by that point you 
might acquire a new assurance that you 
can continue on living, thus stop worrying as much about whether you are going 
to forget what you are doing at some point and then have your will get taken 
over. 
		 In case you try it out and find something still not working for you, 
there is an email page 
that you can use to contact the author through, in order to work on what is happening 
that could be preventing you from experiencing the many truly wondrous health 
benefits that they have experienced by making their 
		
ATM MHO/SHEEN BET to improve and maintain 
their own condition.  
	 Here's hoping that you get to live a healthier, happier, 
longer life by making your own 
		
ATM MHO/SHEEN BET. * |