The diameter of an electron is considered to be zero and a water film
can be suspended in zero gravity for hours upon hours, because there is no
gravity to pull the asymmetrically weighted ions out of their optimally
attractive orientation. Couldn't that be accepted as evidence that
would substantiate the assertion that quantities of energy and matter are
balanced around the electron with electricity, which holds these two
components of physical phenomena together and not gravity alone, which
only effects directly the material portion of the physical component
of existence and not the energetic portion of the physical component?
If electricity did not connect energy with matter, or act as the link
between radiationally and gravitationally affected phenomena, gravity
could not effect energy and radiation could not effect matter, thus
physical life, as we know it, would not be possible.
When and where we have found
physical life to exist (as far as I know):
is thought of as a volume. A volume is the totality of the concept of space.
"Location," is a point. "Distance," is a line. "Area," is a plane. "Volume," is
space�length, width and height, which because
biological life is bound by electricity to the location known as, "Now," also
contains the, "Point" or location at which it occurs.
is considered to be the location at which the phenomena occurs. "Now," is the
temporal location that all biological phenomena is alive at.
is not considered to be a location but where physical life lives, is the volume
that that phenomena is encapsulated by.
is not considered to be a volume but the location in the action around the
existential equator that physical life is living.
Radiation is a force that directs motion from a location to a volume.
Gravitation is a force that directs motion from a volume to a
Electricity is a force that impels the motion toward an equilibrium of action,
relating the phenomena of the location with the phenomena of the volume by
coordinating the photon's forces of radiation and graviton's forces of
gravitation with each other through the application of electrodynamic and
electrostatic forces of the electron, which effects the result, which is what we
are able to perceive through our bodies' senses, because our bodies are
composed of the materials of the physical medium that they are a part of and
though they are very much more elaborately ordered, function on exactly the same
principles as all of the other materials that they are surrounded by.
I am saying is that though it is true that our bodies are composed of atoms that
have solid nuclei we only move the nuclei's position and possibly alter the way
that they are facing by working with the electrical forces that surround them.
This is what changes physical bodies in ways that we would like to have occur or
in ways that we would not like to have occur, depending on whether we manipulate
the factors that control the electrical phenomena of our physical bodies
correctly or not.
we have been dealing with all along, short of tampering with the nuclei of atoms
by various means for various purposes, is the manipulation of electrical,
gravitational and radiational forces with the aid of a unit that is, itself,
composed of a coordinated collection of electrical, gravitational and
gravitation is a force that induces a contraction of the action of the phenomena
that it effects and radiation is a force that induces the expansion of the
action of the phenomena that it effects, then electricity could be thought of as
a force that induces an adherence to the motions of the particles of the action
devoid of the thrusts of extrinsic forces acting upon them. Electricity is the
means by which the relativity between time and space, or the past and the
future, which are each, singularly, time and space devoid of any of the other,
is established. The future is space without time and the past is time devoid of
space. You can say that the present is a volume that has a duration or vise
versa. Outside it is pure space and inside it is pure time, which are ascribed
as the future and the past.
That would make the
universe a shell, like an electron shell, possessing an overall energy state and
frequency, surrounding, "Gravity," or pure time, which would be a pure solid, in
which there was no possibility of motion. That would be what they call a black
hole. I have read in TIME Magazine that some say that the whole cycle of the
universe is over 100 trillion years, but reading that merely brings up the
question of how many cycles it has been through and more pertinently; is it
truly simultaneous, in that: is everything in it going on at the same moment, or
are different parts of it actually taking place at different points along an
imaginary time line it total existence, as in the locations of different
railroad cars of a train along a railroad track, with physical life merely being
one of those cars; the ties being different durations equivalent in time. This
model is not all that simple in that it would probably work out that different
accelerations of bodies (cars) would quantify, "When," those bodies (cars)
existed comparatively to the other bodies, correlating to where along the train
any particular car, including the, "Physical Life Car," was located,
relatively. And to take that model to its ultimate juncture, the question
would be, "Can that train track be run on a Merry-Go-Round that held the life
car at the correct degree angle around the curve to balance the acceleratory and
deceleratory components to an equilibrium so that the train was standing still?"
That model needs inspection, what I am suggesting is that each car, goes through
every stage of development, from the starting bang to the deep freeze of total
solidity, which is pure time with no action and back around again, with the big
bang being the point of ultimate acceleration of the universe; that point being
experienced by us on the, "Living Horse," as being back around the bend known as
the past, but really, because of its continual acceleration at the speed of
light, not being effected by time, is not, to this day, to itself even one
I am saying that if you
were a photon, born at the beginning of the universe, traveling at the speed of
light, you would not believe that the universe existed for longer than a time
that would make a second look like an eon for however far you got at the point
in time that is simultaneous to the point in time that we are at here on Earth
that some scientists believe is 11 billion years from the beginning of the
universe. That would make the photon Time's crow; wouldn't it.
Back to simpler
relationships; if gravity is the force that impedes motion and radiation is the
force that impels motion, then electricity is the force that balances those two
forces and renders each inert with the other. Ergo, while gravity induces
contraction and radiation induces expansion, electricity is what induces
There are three main
physical forces that could be thought of as three, "I's," standing for,
"Impulse," "Inertia," and "Impediment," that are used by the last, "I," the,
"Individual," or the force of resolve as to what to do with that triplet of
From the oriental
perspective the whole picture could be captioned with Four, "Y's;" those being:
the Yin, the Yang, the Yen and the You; where, "Yin," is the force of
contraction, "Yang," is the force of expansion, "Yen," is the force of
suspension and, the "You," is the force of decision regarding the use of the