| The diameter of an electron is considered to be zero and a water film 
      can be suspended in zero gravity for hours upon hours, because there is no 
      gravity to pull the asymmetrically weighted ions out of their optimally 
      attractive orientation. Couldn't that be accepted as evidence that 
      would substantiate the assertion that quantities of energy and matter are 
      balanced around the electron with electricity, which holds these two 
      components of physical phenomena together and not gravity alone, which 
      only effects directly the material portion of the physical component 
      of existence and not the energetic portion of the physical component?
        If electricity did not connect energy with matter, or act as the link 
      between radiationally and gravitationally affected phenomena, gravity 
      could not effect energy and radiation could not effect matter, thus 
      physical life, as we know it,  would not be possible.   When and where we have found 
physical life to exist (as far as I know):    Space 
is thought of as a volume. A volume is the totality of the concept of space. 
"Location," is a point. "Distance," is a line. "Area," is a plane. "Volume," is 
space�length, width and height, which because 
biological life is bound by electricity to the location known as, "Now," also 
contains the, "Point" or location at which it occurs.                          
     Time 
is considered to be the location at which the phenomena occurs. "Now," is the 
temporal location that all biological phenomena is alive at.                          
     Space 
is not considered to be a location but where physical life lives, is the volume 
that that phenomena is encapsulated by.       Time 
is not considered to be a volume but the location in the action around the 
existential equator that physical life is living.        
Radiation is a force that directs motion from a location to a volume.       
Gravitation is a force that directs motion from a volume to a 
location.                            
     
Electricity is a force that impels the motion toward an equilibrium of action, 
relating the phenomena of the location with the phenomena of the volume by 
coordinating the photon's forces of radiation and graviton's forces of 
gravitation with each other through the application of electrodynamic and 
electrostatic forces of the electron, which effects the result, which is what we 
are able to perceive through our bodies' senses,  because our bodies are 
composed of the materials of the physical medium that they are a part of and 
though they are very much more elaborately ordered, function on exactly the same 
principles as all of the other materials that they are surrounded by.       What 
I am saying is that though it is true that our bodies are composed of atoms that 
have solid nuclei we only move the nuclei's position and possibly alter the way 
that they are facing by working with the electrical forces that surround them. 
This is what changes physical bodies in ways that we would like to have occur or 
in ways that we would not like to have occur, depending on whether we manipulate 
the factors that control the electrical phenomena of our physical bodies 
correctly or not.       What 
we have been dealing with all along, short of tampering with the nuclei of atoms 
by various means for various purposes, is the manipulation of electrical, 
gravitational and radiational forces with the aid of a unit that is, itself, 
composed of a coordinated collection of electrical, gravitational and 
radiant forces.        If 
gravitation is a force that induces a contraction of the action of the phenomena 
that it effects and radiation is a force that induces the expansion of the 
action of the phenomena that it effects, then electricity could be thought of as 
a force that induces an adherence to the motions of the particles of the action 
devoid of the thrusts of extrinsic forces acting upon them. Electricity is the 
means by which the relativity between time and space, or the past and the 
future, which are each, singularly, time and space devoid of any of the other, 
is established. The future is space without time and the past is time devoid of 
space. You can say that the present is a volume that has a duration or vise 
versa. Outside it is pure space and inside it is pure time, which are ascribed 
as the future and the past.    That would make the 
universe a shell, like an electron shell, possessing an overall energy state and 
frequency, surrounding, "Gravity," or pure time, which would be a pure solid, in 
which there was no possibility of motion. That would be what they call a black 
hole. I have read in TIME Magazine that some say that the whole cycle of the 
universe is over 100 trillion years, but reading that merely brings up the 
question of how many cycles it has been through and more pertinently; is it 
truly simultaneous, in that: is everything in it going on at the same moment, or 
are different parts of it actually taking place at different points along an 
imaginary time line it total existence, as in the locations of different 
railroad cars of a train along a railroad track, with physical life merely being 
one of those cars; the ties being different durations equivalent in time. This 
model is not all that simple in that it would probably work out that different 
accelerations of bodies (cars) would quantify, "When," those bodies (cars) 
existed comparatively to the other bodies, correlating to where along the train 
any particular car, including the, "Physical Life Car," was located, 
relatively.  And to take that model to its ultimate juncture, the question 
would be, "Can that train track be run on a Merry-Go-Round that held the life 
car at the correct degree angle around the curve to balance the acceleratory and 
deceleratory components to an equilibrium so that the train was standing still?" 
That model needs inspection, what I am suggesting is that each car, goes through 
every stage of development, from the starting bang to the deep freeze of total 
solidity, which is pure time with no action and back around again, with the big 
bang being the point of ultimate acceleration of the universe; that point being 
experienced by us on the, "Living Horse," as being back around the bend known as 
the past, but really, because of its continual acceleration at the speed of 
light, not being effected by time, is not, to this day, to itself even one 
second old.    I am saying that if you 
were a photon, born at the beginning of the universe, traveling at the speed of 
light, you would not believe that the universe existed for longer than a time 
that would make a second look like an eon for however far you got at the point 
in time that is simultaneous to the point in time that we are at here on Earth 
that some scientists believe is 11 billion years from the beginning of the 
universe. That would make the photon Time's crow; wouldn't it.   Back to simpler 
relationships; if gravity is the force that impedes motion and radiation is the 
force that impels motion, then electricity is the force that balances those two 
forces and renders each inert with the other. Ergo, while gravity induces 
contraction and radiation induces expansion, electricity is what induces 
inertia.   There are three main 
physical forces that could be thought of as three, "I's," standing for, 
"Impulse," "Inertia," and "Impediment," that are used by the last, "I," the, 
"Individual," or the force of resolve as to what to do with that triplet of 
force."   From the oriental 
perspective the whole picture could be captioned with Four, "Y's;" those being: 
the Yin, the Yang, the Yen and the You; where,  "Yin," is the force of 
contraction, "Yang," is the force of expansion, "Yen," is the force of 
suspension and, the "You," is the force of decision regarding the use of the 
other three.   To be 
continued... |